Language Learning Strategies of EFL College Students

Dewi Furwana


The objectives of the research were (1) to investigate the most dominant language learning strategies (LLS) used by sixth semester students of English Department of Tarbiyah Faculty at UIN Alauddin Makassar and (2) to find out the differences of using LLS between high achieving students and low achieving students. The result of the quantitative data through questionnaire showed that (1) metacognitive strategies was the most dominant LLS used, and (2) the high achieving students used metacognitive strategies with the highest preference and low achieving students used compensation strategies with the highest preference. The result of the qualitative data through think aloud showed that (1) the most dominant LLS employed by students were listening music, utilizing time for practicing and self-evaluating, (2) the most dominant LLS used by high achieving students were utilizing time for practicing, practicing English together and self-evaluating, whereas the most dominant LLS used by low achieving students were listening music, asking friend and selecting topic. The data were collected through documentation used to classify high achieving students and low achieving students based on their grade point average. It is concluded that the most dominant language learning strategies employed by students was metacognitive strategies. High achieving students employed different strategy than low achieving students. High achieving students used learning strategies more frequently than low achieving students.


language learning strategies; metacognitive; compensation

Full Text:



Chang, C.Y, Liu, S.C. & Lee, Y.N. (2007). A Study of Language Learning Strategies Used by College EFL Learners in Taiwan.

Deneme, S. (2008). Language Learning Strategy Preferences of Turkish Students. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 4(2).

Dhanapala, K. V. (2007). Focus on Language Learning Strategies of Advanced Learners in Japan and Sri Lanka. Journal of International Development and Cooperation, 13(1) pp. 153-164.

Gay, et al. (2006). Educational Research. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A Closer Look at Learning Strategies, L2 Proficiency, and Gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), pp. 261-297.

Larsen-Freeman, D. & Long, M.H. (1991). An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. New York: Longman Inc.

Oxford, R.L. (1990). Language learning strategies and beyond: A look at strategies in the context of styles. In S.S. Magnan (Ed.), Shifting the instructional focus to the learner pp. 35-55. Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.

Rahimi, R. & Saif. (2004). An investigation into the factors affecting the use of language learning strategies by Persian EFL learners. RCLA. CJAL Journal, 11, (pp.31-60).

Saricoban, A., & Saricaouglu, A. (2008). The Effects of the Relationship between Learning and Teaching Strategies on Academic Achievement. Novitas-Royal, 2 (2), pp. 162-175.

Simsek, A. & Blaban, J. (2010). Learning Strategies of Successful and Unsuccesful University Students. Contemporary Educational Technology. Anadolu University, Turkey.

Vann, R. J. & Abraham, R. G. (1990). Strategies of Unsuccessful Language Learners. TESOL Quarterly, 24, pp. 177-198.

Williams, M. & Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 95 times
PDF - 109 times

Copyright (c) 2017 Dewi Furwana

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2540-9190 (Online) * ISSN 2355-3448 (Print)